Skip to content
Policy

Academic integrity

This policy governs every ThinkLab engagement, without exception. It applies to every service, every client, and every deadline, and it is written into the agreement you sign before any work begins.

Our commitment

This is the statement we work to. It is repeated in full in every service agreement, and it is the test every request is measured against.

ThinkLab is an academic coaching and editorial consultancy. Our services are limited to education, skills development, and language editing. All research, analysis, and final writing decisions remain the sole responsibility of the client. We do not complete assignments, take examinations, or guarantee academic outcomes.

ThinkLab statement of scope, applied to every engagement.

Read plainly: we teach, we edit, and we review. You remain the author of your work, and you remain accountable for it.

What we will never do

Six refusals. They are not negotiable, and they do not move for a deadline, a fee, or a rewording of the request.

  • Ghostwriting

    Writing assignments, theses, dissertations, or reports, in whole or in part, for you to submit as your own.

  • Sitting exams

    Taking exams, quizzes, tests, or timed online assessments in your place, under any arrangement.

  • Portal access

    Logging into your university portal, student email, or learning system, or submitting work as you.

  • Outcome guarantees

    Guaranteeing a grade, a pass, an acceptance, or a publication. No supplier can control any of these.

  • Data misconduct

    Fabricating, manipulating, or selectively omitting data, results, or citations to make a finding look stronger.

  • Work you cannot defend

    Producing content you could not explain or defend in a viva, a supervision meeting, or a review.

If a request falls into one of these six, we decline it and tell you which part crossed the line. We do not quietly reshape it into something that looks acceptable on an invoice.

What you agree to

Integrity is not one-sided. When you accept a service agreement, you confirm the following.

  • The material you send us is your own original work, except where sources are properly cited and attributed.
  • Everything we return is used for guidance, learning, and editing support only.
  • You will not submit a deliverable as your own work where doing so would breach your institution's rules.
  • You have read your institution's rules on third-party editing and proofreading, and you will tell us where they limit our scope.
  • Where your institution asks for it, you will acknowledge the editorial or language support you received.

Rules differ between institutions, and sometimes between departments in the same institution. Where your rules are stricter than this policy, your rules apply, and we will work inside them.

What our reports are not

Two things are widely misunderstood, so we state them here rather than in small print.

Similarity, not clearance

Where a service includes a similarity check, you receive an iThenticate similarity report and our reading of it. There is no such thing as a Turnitin certificate. A similarity report is a diagnostic that shows matched text; it is not a clearance, a pass mark, or proof of originality.

Review, not accreditation

ThinkLab is not an accreditation body. ABET accredits university programmes, not documents, and no consultancy can accredit a report, a thesis, or a design. What we provide is a technical or editorial review against a published standard or rubric, signed by the reviewer.

How the workflow protects you

The policy is enforced by the process, not by good intentions. Six steps sit between a first message and a closed job.

  1. 1

    Intake and screening

    Before we quote, we ask for your brief, your rubric, and your institution's policy on editing and third-party support. Requests that fall outside this policy are declined at this step, not after payment.

  2. 2

    Service agreement

    Scope, boundary, price, and delivery date are written down before work starts. The commitment above forms part of that agreement.

  3. 3

    Draft-based engagement

    We work from your draft, your data, or your outline. No service begins with an empty document, because that would make us the author.

  4. 4

    Tracked changes and comments

    Edits arrive as tracked changes with comments explaining the reason for each one. You accept or reject them, so the final text remains a set of your decisions.

  5. 5

    Reflection step

    Before a job closes we ask you to describe, in your own words, what changed and why. If a section is still unclear to you, we go back over it rather than sign it off.

  6. 6

    Follow-up coaching

    A short session after delivery to work through whatever the review exposed, so the same problem does not return in your next chapter or paper.

Contract cheating

Contract cheating is the practice of submitting work produced by someone else as if it were your own, whether that work was bought, traded, or given. It covers essay mills, ghostwritten theses, paid exam sitting, and rewriting services that hand back a finished document the student did not write.

Universities worldwide treat it as serious misconduct. Penalties commonly include a mark of zero, a failed module, suspension, expulsion, or the withdrawal of a degree already awarded, and the finding can stay on an academic record. The risk sits with the student, not with the supplier. Any service that tells you otherwise is describing something it cannot control.

Several jurisdictions have gone further and criminalised commercial essay mills, making it an offence to provide or advertise these services:

  • England and Wales
  • Australia
  • New Zealand
  • Ireland
  • Austria

Where ThinkLab stands

ThinkLab declines contract cheating requests, and we say why rather than going quiet. If part of a brief crosses the line, we name that part, and we set out what we could do instead within this policy: coaching on the argument, editing of text you have written, or a technical review of your own work. Sometimes there is no version we can take on, and we say that too.

Ask first

If you are unsure

Send us the brief and your institution’s integrity policy. We will read both and tell you plainly whether we can help, which parts we can take on, and which we cannot. The answer is sometimes no, and you will have it before you pay rather than after.

Asking costs nothing and takes less time than a misconduct hearing.